lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:09:53 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree Hi all, On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 07:57:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > > between commit: > > 37f6b42e9c29 ("ACPI/IORT: Fix PCI ACS enablement") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 896dd2c32484 ("ACPI/IORT: Make platform devices initialization code SMMU agnostic") > > from the arm64 tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > index de56394dd161,7dc964f4d8f1..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > @@@ -1215,7 -1326,7 +1357,8 @@@ static void __init iort_init_platform_d > struct acpi_table_iort *iort; > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > int i, ret; > + bool acs_enabled = false; > + const struct iort_dev_config *ops; > > /* > * iort_table and iort both point to the start of IORT table, but > @@@ -1235,12 -1346,8 +1378,11 @@@ > return; > } > > + if (!acs_enabled) > + acs_enabled = iort_enable_acs(iort_node); > + > - if ((iort_node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) || > - (iort_node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3)) { > - > + ops = iort_get_dev_cfg(iort_node); > + if (ops) { > fwnode = acpi_alloc_fwnode_static(); > if (!fwnode) > return; Just a reminder that this conflict still exists. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists