linux-kernel - Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:26:04 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
        Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to
 properly identify file licenses

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:

> 2017-11-13 13:26 GMT+01:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:
> >> > +If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the
> >> > +appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used.
> >>
> >> Most of the things sound good. But I really don't get the first-line
> >> thing and the C++ single line comments in C sources.
> >
> > That's been a decision from Linus and probably not going to change, even if
> > you argue in circles.
> 
> I always thought that Linus is the person reponsible for unfriendly
> responses. But ok, when it is not wanted to discuss anything then please
> ignore me.

That was not meant unfriendly. I merily tried to make it clear that it's a
decision which I'm pretty sure that it won't be changed. Feel free to
discuss it with Linus.

Thanks,

	tglx