lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:54:36 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] regmap updates for v4.15

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:30:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Actually one other thing that just occurred to me is that they might be
> > upset by the mails I send telling people I've applied their patches.  If
> > that is the case I'm really not sure what to do.

> If those people then mark you as spam, then gmail would probably notice.

It's a *relatively* big form letter that gets sent out a lot (with the
patch at the bottom) so I can see automated stuff picking up on it as me
trying to sell people hot kernel contributions or whatever.

> But I don't think you apply sufficient numbers of patches for gmail to
> really care. People like David Miller, yes. But even his emails don't
> get hated on by gmail.

> So I think it's more likely that it's the spamhaus listing.

I was more thinking about spamhaus listing based on the applied mails, I
guess Google could do it directly too.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ