| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:02:40 +0000
From: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....com>, "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>,
"hongtao.jia@....com" <hongtao.jia@....com>,
Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"pbrobinson@...il.com" <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
"songxiaowei@...ilicon.com" <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>,
"Mingkai Hu" <mingkai.hu@....com>,
"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv4 2/3] ARMv8: layerscape: add the pcie ep function support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I [mailto:kishon@...com]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 2:32 PM
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> mark.rutland@....com; catalin.marinas@....com; will.deacon@....com;
> bhelgaas@...gle.com; shawnguo@...nel.org; Madalin-cristian Bucur
> <madalin.bucur@....com>; Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....com>; Y.b. Lu
> <yangbo.lu@....com>; hongtao.jia@....com; Andy Tang
> <andy.tang@....com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>; jingoohan1@...il.com;
> pbrobinson@...il.com; songxiaowei@...ilicon.com;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@....com>; Mingkai Hu
> <mingkai.hu@....com>; M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] ARMv8: layerscape: add the pcie ep function support
>
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 10 November 2017 09:18 AM, Bao Xiaowei wrote:
> > Add the pcie controller ep function support of layerscape base on pcie
> > ep framework.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bao Xiaowei <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - fix the ioremap function used but no ioumap issue
> > - optimize the code structure
> > - add code comments
> > v3:
> > - fix the msi outband window request failed issue
> > v4:
> > - optimize the code, adjust the format
> >
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 120
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> $subject should begin with
> PCI: layerscape:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> > index 87fa486bee2c..6f3e434599e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> > @@ -34,7 +34,12 @@
> > /* PEX Internal Configuration Registers */
> > #define PCIE_STRFMR1 0x71c /* Symbol Timer & Filter Mask
> Register1 */
> >
> > +#define PCIE_DBI2_BASE 0x1000 /* DBI2 base address*/
>
> The base address should come from dt.
We get the dbi base address form dt, and this is the offset base on the dbi base address, if the follow patch is merged, this define is not needed.
> > +#define PCIE_MSI_MSG_DATA_OFF 0x5c /* MSI Data register address*/
> > +#define PCIE_MSI_OB_SIZE 4096
> > +#define PCIE_MSI_ADDR_OFFSET (1024 * 1024)
> > #define PCIE_IATU_NUM 6
> > +#define PCIE_EP_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x100000000
> >
> > struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> > u32 lut_offset;
> > @@ -44,12 +49,20 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> > const struct dw_pcie_ops *dw_pcie_ops; };
> >
> > +struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > + dma_addr_t msi_phys_addr;
> > + void __iomem *msi_virt_addr;
> > + u64 msi_msg_addr;
> > + u16 msi_msg_data;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct ls_pcie {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > void __iomem *lut;
> > struct regmap *scfg;
> > const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> > int index;
> > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie_ep;
> > };
> >
> > #define to_ls_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > @@ -263,6 +276,99 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] =
> {
> > { },
> > };
> >
> > +static void ls_pcie_raise_msi_irq(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie_ep) {
> > + iowrite32(pcie_ep->msi_msg_data, pcie_ep->msi_virt_addr); }
> > +
> > +static int ls_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> > + enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num) {
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie_ep = pcie->pcie_ep;
> > + u32 free_win;
> > +
> > + /* get the msi message address and msi message data */
> > + pcie_ep->msi_msg_addr = ioread32(pci->dbi_base +
> MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_L32) |
> > + (((u64)ioread32(pci->dbi_base + MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_U32)) <<
> 32);
> > + pcie_ep->msi_msg_data = ioread16(pci->dbi_base +
> > +PCIE_MSI_MSG_DATA_OFF);
> > +
> > + /* request and config the outband window for msi */
> > + free_win = find_first_zero_bit(&ep->ob_window_map,
> > + sizeof(ep->ob_window_map));
> > + if (free_win >= ep->num_ob_windows) {
> > + dev_err(pci->dev, "no free outbound window\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, free_win, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM,
> > + pcie_ep->msi_phys_addr,
> > + pcie_ep->msi_msg_addr,
> > + PCIE_MSI_OB_SIZE);
> > +
> > + set_bit(free_win, &ep->ob_window_map);
>
> This custom logic is not required. You can use [1] instead
>
> [1] ->
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.or
> g%2Flkml%2F2017%2F11%2F3%2F318&data=02%7C01%7Cxiaowei.bao%40nxp.
> com%7Cdefeb10941b145bc81ac08d528051939%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c
> 5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636458924733901810&sdata=3TMGeoj3L9SlNsXeAYN
> %2BSe0K1Orv3xb7Ah9G%2BD9k4Rg%3D&reserved=0
These patchs have not merged on the latest kernel, yes? I will test it when these patchs merged, analyzed the patch, it is viable for ls1046a platform.
> > +
> > + /* generate the msi interrupt */
> > + ls_pcie_raise_msi_irq(pcie_ep);
> > +
> > + /* release the outband window of msi */
> > + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, free_win, DW_PCIE_REGION_OUTBOUND);
> > + clear_bit(free_win, &ep->ob_window_map);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
> > + .raise_irq = ls_pcie_raise_irq,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie *pcie,
> > + struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep;
> > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie_ep;
> > + struct resource *cfg_res;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ep = &pci->ep;
> > + ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
> > +
> > + pcie_ep = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie_ep), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pcie_ep)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + pcie->pcie_ep = pcie_ep;
> > +
> > + cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> "config");
> > + if (cfg_res) {
> > + ep->phys_base = cfg_res->start;
> > + ep->addr_size = PCIE_EP_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing *config* space\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pcie_ep->msi_phys_addr = ep->phys_base + PCIE_MSI_ADDR_OFFSET;
> > +
> > + pcie_ep->msi_virt_addr = ioremap(pcie_ep->msi_phys_addr,
> > + PCIE_MSI_OB_SIZE);
> > + if (!pcie_ep->msi_virt_addr) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to map MSI outbound region\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(ep);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize endpoint\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie) {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > @@ -309,18 +415,18 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> >
> > - pcie->lut = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->lut_offset;
> > + pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_BASE;
> >
> > - if (!ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + pcie->lut = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->lut_offset;
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> >
> > - ret = ls_add_pcie_port(pcie);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + if (!ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
> > + ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
>
> HOST or EP mode should be obtained directly from dt.
The RC or EP mode can configured by the rcw, we can't obtain the RC or EP mode from the dt, we can obtain the RC or EP mode by reading the specific register in code.
>
> Thanks
> Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists