linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 07/19] KVM: s390: introduce AP matrix configuration interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:16:31 +0100
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@...gnu.org,
        jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/19] KVM: s390: introduce AP matrix configuration
 interface

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:38:52 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> This patch introduces a new compilation unit that will contain
> all of the data structures and logic for configuring AP adapters,
> usage domains and control domains for a KVM guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                       |    2 ++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/ap-config.h |   12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/Makefile            |    2 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/ap-config.c         |    9 +++++++++
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/ap-config.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/ap-config.c

This is a bit useless on its own... merge this with the actual
implementation?