lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:35:13 -0800
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/294] 3.16.50-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:40:36PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:55:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> > > > I think if you upload the branch to the stable-rc git, that should produce
>>> > > > the automated build and boot results via email or via the
>>> > > > https://kernelci.org/job/ interface. Once there are some results
>>> > > > there, I'll go through the list once more to see what warnings
>>> > > > and failures remain.
>>> > >
>>> > > I don't know of a way to have others push to that tree/branch at the
>>> > > moment :(
>>> > >
>>> > > I'll go update that branch now...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > With the arm-soc tree, we simply have a shared group-id on
>>> > gitolite.kernel.org and everyone in that group can push to it.
>>> >
>>> > If that is the only thing you need, it should be trivial to let Ben
>>> > and Sasha push to /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/*.git as well,
>>> > I'm sure helpdesk@...nel.org can arrange that. Of course if you are
>>> > worried about having multiple accounts with write access to all the
>>> > branches, then that wouldn't be enough.
>>>
>>> I think I'd rather send a pull request to Greg at the start of the
>>> review period.
>>
>> That works for me!
>
> We just discussed this on the #kernelci IRC channel. Since kernelci
> has a whitelist of branches and 3.16 isn't currently on it, how about
> just adding a different git tree for Ben's 3.2-rc and 3.16-rc releases?

We are currently reaching the limits of our current build capacity, so
want to understand the users before adding more trees.

That being said, it seems Ben is now pushing to Greg's stable-rc, so
we can pretty easily add linux-3.16.y to our list of stable-rc
branches if there is enough interest.  Also, we would much prefer
monitoring a git branch, since kernelci does not currently deal with
git + quilt (and we have no time, and less motivation to add it) :)

Kevin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ