linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] prctl: prctl(PR_SET_IDLE, PR_IDLE_MODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:35:48 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Shawn Landden <slandden@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] prctl: prctl(PR_SET_IDLE, PR_IDLE_MODE_KILLME), for
 stateless idle loops

On Fri 17-11-17 20:45:03, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu 02-11-17 23:35:44, Shawn Landden wrote:
> > > It is common for services to be stateless around their main event loop.
> > > If a process sets PR_SET_IDLE to PR_IDLE_MODE_KILLME then it
> > > signals to the kernel that epoll_wait() and friends may not complete,
> > > and the kernel may send SIGKILL if resources get tight.
> > >
> > > See my systemd patch: https://github.com/shawnl/systemd/tree/prctl
> > >
> > > Android uses this memory model for all programs, and having it in the
> > > kernel will enable integration with the page cache (not in this
> > > series).
> > >
> > > 16 bytes per process is kinda spendy, but I want to keep
> > > lru behavior, which mem_score_adj does not allow. When a supervisor,
> > > like Android's user input is keeping track this can be done in
> > user-space.
> > > It could be pulled out of task_struct if an cross-indexing additional
> > > red-black tree is added to support pid-based lookup.
> >
> > This is still an abuse and the patch is wrong. We really do have an API
> > to use I fail to see why you do not use it.
> >
> When I looked at wait_queue_head_t it was 20 byes.

I do not understand. What I meant to say is that we do have a proper
user api to hint OOM killer decisions.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs