lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:37:26 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma: Add Jason as a co-maintainer

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:04:56AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:06:31AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:10:16PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:44:00PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > As was discussed in September and October, add Jason along with
> > > > Doug to have a team maintainership model for the RDMA subystem.
> > > >
> > > > Mellanox Technologies will be funding Jason's independent work on
> > > > the maintainership.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> > > >  .mailmap    | 2 ++
> > > >  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Doug and Jason,
> > >
> > > Can you forward the current fixes to Linus?
> > >
> > > I have more fixes from Parav and fix to iWARP from Daniel, but I prefer
> > > to have proper RDMA branches before I'm posting them.
> >
> > I belive Doug has already sent the pull request for this merge window,
> > and the new shared tree location is fully up to date, and there are
> > no accepted but unset patches at this time?
>
> I still see for-rc points to old (4.14) code.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/log/?h=k.o/for-rc
>
> There is a need to advance -rc to be equal to -next during merge window,
> so we will be able to actually base our -rc/-next patches.

And for-next misses one patch, which I sent directly to Linus
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10032391/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c?id=287683d027a3ff83feb6c7044430c79881664ecf
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/log/?h=k.o/for-next

Thanks

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ