lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:57:07 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Palmer Dabbelt' <palmer@...ive.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "patches@...ups.riscv.org" <patches@...ups.riscv.org>,
        Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] RISC-V: Flush I$ when making a dirty page executable

From: Palmer Dabbelt
> Sent: 20 November 2017 18:58
> 
> The RISC-V ISA allows for instruction caches that are not coherent WRT
> stores, even on a single hart.  As a result, we need to explicitly flush
> the instruction cache whenever marking a dirty page as executable in
> order to preserve the correct system behavior.

Isn't the I-flush only needed if there has been an unmap since the
previous I-flush?
Since code is rarely unmapped (exec and driver unload come to mind)
the I-flush won't be needed very often.

	David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ