linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/30] [media] atomisp: deprecate pci_get_bus_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:05:08 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        timur@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Avraham Shukron <avraham.shukron@...il.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr>,
        "open list:MEDIA INPUT INFRASTRUCTURE (V4L/DVB)" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/30] [media] atomisp: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

Hi Alex,

On 11/22/2017 7:20 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 00:31 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0
>> as
>> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to
>> be
>> reused for other domain numbers.
> 
> The ISP v2 will always been in domain 0.
> 

Sorry, I didn't get what you mean. Do you mean that you are OK with the
change (thus, can I get a reviewed by) or do you mean that I should fix
the commit message?

I wrote a generic commit message and applied it to all 30 patches that
are more or less similar. I can certainly tailor the message a little
bit for atomisp since you confirmed domain 0.

> Alan
> 
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.