linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:46:42 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        syzbot 
        <bot+9abea25706ae35022385a41f61e579ed66e88a3f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in sock_release

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 05:18:33AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:07:19AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > Incidentally, grepping for sys_close() shows another piece of fun in
> > net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c.  Folks, ONCE DESCRIPTOR IS INSTALLED, THAT'S
> > IT; THERE'S NO REMOVING IT ON FAILURE EXITS.  sys_close() should
> > never, ever be used that way.  Sigh...
> 
> Would be great do unexport the thing.  Except that we also have
> binfmt_misc (which looks legit) and autofs4, which on crack decided
> that close() isn't a fun syscall, they'd much rather have an ioctl
> that does exactly the same..

Yes, since binfmt_misc one is guaranteed that its descriptor table is
not shared - all callchains go through do_execveat_common(), where we'd
use unshare_files().  autofs one is... not in good taste, but still
safe; there the descriptor is preexisting and it's essentially a weird
way of spelling close(2).  References from syscall tables are, of course,
OK.  init/*.c uses are done pretty much from userland - they could have
been straight syscalls, if not for the lack of klibc in kernel tree.
Everything else, though...

IMO we need a whack-a-mole list somewhere; "new callers of sys_close()
anywhere outside of init/* and syscall tables" definitely should be
on it...