linux-kernel - Re: KAISER: kexec triggers a warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:38:50 -0800
From:   Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <mingo@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <hughd@...gle.com>, <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: KAISER: kexec triggers a warning

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:31:36AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > The only question is whether we want to preserve _some_ kind of warning
> > there, or just axe it entirely.
> 
> Right, my fear would be if we keep it, then we'd have to go and
> whitelist or somehow track those users which are an exception...
> 
> OTOH, it might be prudent to have a warning to catch such abnormal
> situations...

But a warn like that on the kexec/kdump path can be scary for regular / unware users,
specially considering that kexec is almost common place for regular reboot.

> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
> 

-- 
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin