linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Arm: mm: ftrace: Only set text back to ro after kernel has been marked ro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:14:17 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Matthias Reichl <hias@...us.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Arm: mm: ftrace: Only set text back to ro after kernel
 has been marked ro

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:09PM +0100, Matthias Reichl wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 03:03:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:48:13 -0700
> > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > > > index ad80548..fd75f38 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > > > @@ -745,19 +745,29 @@ static int __mark_rodata_ro(void *unused)
> > > >         return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static int kernel_set_to_readonly;  
> > > 
> > > Adding a comment here might be a good idea, something like:
> > > 
> > > /* Has system boot-up reached mark_rodata_ro() yet? */
> > 
> > I don't mind adding a comment, but the above is rather self explanatory
> > (one can easily see that it is set in mark_rodata_ro() with a simple
> > search).
> > 
> > If a comment is to be added, something a bit more descriptive of the
> > functionality of the variable would be appropriate:
> > 
> > /*
> >  * Ignore modifying kernel text permissions until the kernel core calls
> >  * make_rodata_ro() at system start up.
> >  */
> > 
> > I can resend with the comment, or whoever takes this could add it
> > themselves.
> 
> Gentle ping: this patch doesn't seem to have landed in upstream
> trees yet. Is any more work required?
> 
> It would be nice to have this fix added. Just tested next-20171205
> on RPi B+, it oopses when the function tracer is enabled during boot.
> next-20171205 plus this patch boots up fine.

When does it oops?

Reading through this code, I'm left wondering why we switch the rodata
section to be writable here - if we're poking at kernel text, then
surely we shouldn't be the read-only data read-write?

Should kernel_set_to_readonly also be a rodata-after-init variable?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up