linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: protect macro argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:03:24 +0100
From:   Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     timur@...i.org, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: protect macro argument

On 2017-12-06 15:39, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 03:25:37PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 2017-12-06 15:11, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
[...]
>> I did not meant to bug people, just wanted to make sure the patch does
>> not falls through the cracks... After all, patch as well as the Ack
>> already more than 3 months old....
> 
> You need to send patches to the relevant maintainers as covered in
> SubmittingPatches, if you don't send us patches we won't have them and
> can't apply them.

Yeah this is where it gets a bit fuzzy around the affected file, there
are maintainers mentioned in the MAINTAINER file but I just realized
today that it was typically you which merged patches for the file.

Will resend the patch and add you as recipient.

--
Stefan