lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:52:28 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: tcb_clksrc: Fix clock speed message On 07/12/2017 17:34, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 07/12/2017 at 12:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 01/12/2017 13:22, Romain Izard wrote: >>> The clock speed displayed at boot in an information message was 500 kHz >>> too high compared to its real value. As the value is not used anywhere, >>> there is no functional impact. >>> >>> Fix the rounding formula to display the correct value. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com> >>> --- >>> v2: rebase over v4.15-rc1 >>> >>> There is no specified maintainer for this file, only supporters. >> >> That is not correct, it defaults to Thomas and me, the maintainers of >> drivers/clocksource :) >> >>> Nicolas, could you pick this through the at91 tree as the TCB block >>> is an AT91 peripheral ? >> >> Nicolas, do you agree with this change ? If yes, I will take it. > > Yes, fine with me: > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> > > Thanks Daniel for the "heads-up". Thanks, applied 4.16. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists