lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 07:14:53 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, "4 . 14+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay_us to 20 ms > > 30000 was not reliable. > > > > I created root cron job > > @reboot sleep 120; /sbin/reboot > > > > and by the evening it was dead again. > > > > Will try 50000 tomorrow. > > Lets make it similar to what it was before my original patch modified > it, to avoid all corner cases. > > Please test against 200 ms, 200000 value here. 20000 was the first one tested, after it was unreliable, I tested 30000 and that was unreliable too. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists