linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] staging: ccree: remove inline qualifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:00:11 +0200
From:   Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ofir Drang <ofir.drang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] staging: ccree: remove inline qualifiers

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:58:12PM +0000, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>> The ccree drivers was marking a lot of big functions in C file as
>> static inline for no good reason. Remove the inline qualifier from
>> any but the few truly single line functions.
>>
>
> The compiler is free to ignore inline hints...  It probably would make
> single line functions inline anyway.
>

Yes. I think of it more as a note to the reader: "don't add stuff to
this function. it is meant to be short and simple".


-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker

"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
 -- Jean-Baptiste Queru