linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 34/35] clocksource/drivers/Kconfig: Support andestech atcpit100 timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:40:16 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Rick Chen <rickchen36@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 34/35] clocksource/drivers/Kconfig: Support andestech
 atcpit100 timer

On 28/11/2017 03:53, Greentime Hu wrote:
> 2017-11-27 22:11 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Rick Chen <rickchen36@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Add CLKSRC_ATCPIT100 for Andestech atcpit100 timer selection.
>>> It often be used in Andestech AE3XX platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chen <rickchen36@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
>>
>> No need to split out the Makefile patch from the actual driver, they
>> clearly belong together.
>> The binding change should be a separate patch, as you did.
>>
>> It's probably best to separate the driver patches from the
>> architecture submission
>> in the future, they can simply get merged by the respective subsystem
>> maintainers,
>> with a smaller Cc list.
>>
> 
> Hi, Arnd:
> 
> Thanks.
> We will merge these 2 patches together in the next version patch.
> We will sent to clocksource subsystem with a seperate patchset.

Sounds good.



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog