lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:17:11 +0100
From:   Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@...nix.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@...il.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Günter Röck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USB: hub: Delete an error message for a failed memory
 allocation in usb_hub_clear_tt_buffer()

Am Donnerstag, den 07.12.2017, 09:56 +0100 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:45:38AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 
> > A few comments (this is in response to a patch from Markus, so there have
> > to be lots of questions and uncertainties ;-)
> 
> Note, because of the patch author, I'm not applying it no matter what,
> so this discussion is really going nowhere.

We really need to come to a consensus on that question.
If those additional messages really are redundant, we could save
memory deleting them. Or alternatively, if they are not and we need to
know which device is hit, we should centralize that reporting
and tell the VM subsystem not the dump a stack trace.

	Regards
		Oliver

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ