linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:49:48 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gklkml16@...il.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
        mark.rutland@....com,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        Robert Richter <Robert.Richter@...ium.com>,
        "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU
 UNCORE devices



On 12/6/2017 9:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 08:30:37AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/2017 2:42 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:22PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>>>> A quick test with the new patch 'fix_json_v9_2.patch' shows it working.
>>>
>>> I'll take this as a Tested-by: you, ok?
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> I didn't do a full test for this patch and for the whole patch series.
>>
>> I just do a quick test and it shows that the regression issue which was
>> found in 'perf stat --per-thread' test case is disappear.
>>
>> If you think it's enough for adding Tested-by, that's fine for me. :)
> 
> I guess this addresses at least your previous regression report, so I
> think it is warranted, thanks!
> 
> - arnaldo
>   

That's fine, thanks!

Thanks
Jin Yao