lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:44:11 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     mhocko@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Multiple oom_reaper BUGs: unmap_page_range racing with exit_mmap

Michal Hocko wrote:
> David, could you test with this patch please?

Even if this patch solved David's case, you need to update

	 * tsk_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us
	 * either because current->mm is already set to NULL
	 * under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is
	 * set not NULL by the OOM killer only if current->mm
	 * is found not NULL while holding the task_lock.

part as well, for it is the explanation of why
tsk_is_oom_victim() test was expected to work.

Also, do we need to do

  set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);

if mm_is_oom_victim(mm) == false?

exit_mmap() is called means that nobody can reach this mm
except ->signal->oom_mm, and mm_is_oom_victim(mm) == false
means that this mm cannot be reached by ->signal->oom_mm .

Then, I think we do not need to set MMF_OOM_SKIP on this mm
at exit_mmap() if mm_is_oom_victim(mm) == false.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ