linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] iommu: introduce page response function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:52:00 +0000
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
        Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
        "Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] iommu: introduce page response function

On 07/12/17 21:51, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Agree, IOMMU driver cannot enforce it. I think VFIO layer can make sure
>> page response come from the assigned device and its guest/container.
> 
> Can we enforce it via the IOMMU/VFIO interface?  If the response is for
> a struct device, and not an rid/did embedded in a structure, then vfio
> can pass it through w/o worrying about it, ie. response comes in via
> ioctl with association to vfio device fd -> struct vfio_device -> struct
> device, iommu driver fills in rid/did.  Thanks,

Yes that's probably the best way, reporting faults and receiving responses
on the device fd.

Thanks,
Jean