linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] Updates for QCOM Alpha PLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:16:39 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Updates for QCOM Alpha PLL

On 12/08, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> On 2017-12-07 11:53, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 09/28, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> >>This patch series does the miscellaneous changes in QCOM Alpha PLL
> >>operation and structure to support other types of Alpha PLL’s.
> >>
> >>1. It adds the pll_type which will be used for determining all
> >>   the properties of Alpha PLL.
> >>2. It adds the support for Brammo and Huayra PLL’s for which
> >>   the support is not available in existing alpha PLL code.
> >>3. There won’t be any change in existing users of Alpha PLL’s
> >>   since all the newly added code will be under flag for the default
> >>   PLL operations.
> >>
> >
> >Ok. I took a long look at this today. I rewrote a bunch of stuff.
> 
>  Thanks Stephen for reviewing the changes and making the code
>  cleaner. I checked all the code changes and everything looks
>  good. It will work for all of our requirement. I will check
>  with other PLL users also once and then update the patch
>  series with all your suggested code changes after complete
>  testing.

Ok. Please don't resend. I've pushed out the branch to clk-next,
and it can be adjusted if needed, or dropped and rewritten if
something is totally busted.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project