linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Sitronix ST7735R display panels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:33:50 -0600
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     limor@...yada.net, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Sitronix ST7735R
 display panels

On 12/08/2017 03:41 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> 
> Den 29.11.2017 04.01, skrev David Lechner:
>> This adds a new device tree binding for Sitronix ST7735R display panels,
>> such as the Adafruit 1.8" TFT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/display/sitronix,st7735r.txt          | 35 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sitronix,st7735r.txt
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sitronix,st7735r.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sitronix,st7735r.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bbb8ba6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sitronix,st7735r.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +Sitronix ST7735R display panels
>> +
>> +This binding is for display panels using a Sitronix ST7735R 
>> controller in SPI
>> +mode.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible:    "sitronix,st7735r-jd-t18003-t01"
>> +- dc-gpios:    Display data/command selection (D/CX)
>> +- reset-gpios:    Reset signal (RSTX)
> 
> I'm wondering if this should be optional.
> 
> Even though the display needs the reset line to be driven, it doesn't
> have to be so by a gpio, I believe you can even get away with just
> using a resistor as a reset circuit.
> 
> Not terribly important, it's up to you.
> 

It can be made optional later if needed, so I'm going to leave it as-is.