[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:36:15 +0100
From: Tomáš Trnka <trnka@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: System-wide hard RLIMIT_STACK in 4.14.4+ w/ SELinux
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 20:23:47 CET Kees Cook wrote:
> This is an interesting state for the system to be in, though, it means
> AT_SECURE is being set for virtually all processes too? I would expect
> that might break a lot too (but clearly it hasn't).
Not really. AT_SECURE is set only for the exec that triggers a domain
transition, but unlike the rlimits it's not inherited by descendants (as long
as they stay within the same SELinux domain).
2T
Powered by blists - more mailing lists