[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:21:30 -0500
From: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] make some functions return bool
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:50:03PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Yaowei Bai wrote:
>
> > This patchset makes some *_is_* like functions return bool because
> > these functions only use true or false as their return values.
> >
> > No functional changes.
> >
>
> I think the concern about this type of patchset in the past is that it is
> unnecessary churn and makes it more time consuming to research git history
> without any significant improvement.
While, relative to a modern computer with superb computional power, i
think the additional time to search git history is negligable and this
type of patchset is also a good practice for the kernel beginner guys.
:)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists