[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:00:53 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
Hi!
> > > ...should take 10 seconds or so.
> > I'm told 0day does *some* suspend/resume testing, but I think it's
> > pretty limited, partly because the kinds of machines it primarily
> > works on don't really support suspend/resume at all.
>
> currently, we're running suspend test on 1 platform only, with 64 bit
> kernel. suspend test will be enabled on more platforms (laptops) in
> next two weeks.
Thanks!
> > I'm also not sure
> > just how many of those machines are 32-bit at all..
>
> for this, I suppose it can be reproduced if we use 32-bit kernel and
> rootfs, right? Then it's easier to enable this in 0Day.
Yes, Intel cpus are pretty good at backwards compatibility, and most
problems are not subtle at all. So yes, 32-bit kernel / rootfs on
recent machine should be good for testing.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists