lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:41:39 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] clocksource: sprd: Add timer driver for Spreadtrum
 SC9860 platform

Hi Daniel,

On 12 December 2017 at 17:26, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 12 December 2017 at 17:16, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Baolin,
>>
>>
>> On 08/12/2017 09:20, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>>> +static irqreturn_t sprd_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     struct clock_event_device *ce = (struct clock_event_device *)dev_id;
>>>>> +     struct timer_of *to = to_timer_of(ce);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     sprd_timer_clear_interrupt(timer_of_base(to));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     if (clockevent_state_oneshot(ce))
>>>>> +             sprd_timer_disable(timer_of_base(to));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     ce->event_handler(ce);
>>>>> +     return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static struct timer_of to = {
>>>>> +     .flags = TIMER_OF_IRQ | TIMER_OF_BASE,
>>>>
>>>> Why not the TIMER_OF_CLOCK ?
>>>
>>> The timer's clock is fixed to 32.768K and no need to divide the
>>> frequency, so our clock tree does not supply the timer's clock now.
>>
>> The driver is fine. However, I would like to unify the clk usage in the
>> timer driver, so if you refer to a clock so the TIMER_OF_CLOCK can be
>> used, that will nice.
>
> I understand your concern, but I've asked our clock driver owner in
> Spreadtrum, we have no related registers to describe the topology of
> the RTC fixed 32.768K, so the clock driver can not add timer's clock
> node.

Sorry for my misunderstanding, I confirmed with Chunyan (who
upstreamed our clock driver), she told me that we can get the clock
rate from clock node. I will fix this issue in next version. Thanks
for your comments.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ