lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:09:00 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Enable Mixer node for Exynos5800
 Peach Pi machine

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Commit 1cb686c08d12 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add status property to Exynos 542x
>> Mixer nodes") disabled the Mixer node by default in the DTSI and enabled
>> for each Exynos 542x DTS. But unfortunately it missed to enable it for the
>> Exynos5800 Peach Pi machine, since the 5800 is also an 542x SoC variant.
>>
>> Fixes: 1cb686c08d12 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add status property to Exynos 542x Mixer nodes")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Remove RFT tag.
>
> Thanks guys! However I still would like to see a tested-by for this on
> Peach Pi (AFAIU, Marek's only acked the code/solution).

On the other hand I could just apply it for my for-next branch and
we'll see if it fixes kernel-ci boot tests... Not a nice way of
testing but apparently no one has Peach Pi.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ