[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:29:25 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: ethernet: socionext: add AVE
ethernet driver
Hi Russell,
2017-12-11 22:46 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:34:17PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> IMHO, even if we use SPDX license identifier, I recommend to use
>> C-style comments as many other files do, since it is C code.
>> If SPDX identifier requires C++ style, that is SPDX parser's issue
>> and should be fixed to get it from C-style comment.
>
> See the numerous emails on this subject already. The issue of C
> vs C++ comments has come up many times by many different people, but
> the result is the same. That's not going to happen. Linux kernel
> C files are required to use "//" for the SPDX identifier by order
> of Linus Torvalds.
OK, I got it.
>
> Linus has also revealed in that discussion that he has a preference
> for "//" style commenting for single comments, so it seems that the
> kernel coding style may change - but there is no desire for patches
> to "clean up" single line comments to use "//".
Thank you for making it clear.
Then what I'm considering is copyright notice lines. Those are usually
treat as the header lines, not single line. So
> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
> +// Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
> +// Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
is acceptable? or should we keep C-style header lines for new drivers?
> +// SDPX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * sni_ave.c - Socionext UniPhier AVE ethernet driver
> + * Copyright 2014 Panasonic Corporation
> + * Copyright 2015-2017 Socionext Inc.
> + */
I just concern that those lines are not "single". that's all. :)
>
> For further information, and to see the discussion that has already
> happened, the arguments that have been made about style, see the
> threads for the patch series that tglx has been posting wrt documenting
> the SPDX stuff for the kernel.
OK, got it.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/16/663
Thanks,
>
> Thanks (let's stop rehashing the same arguments.)
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists