[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:02:46 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] On ppc64le we HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:12:37PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
> I think that this is not enough. You need to also implement
> save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() for powerpc defined as __weak in
> kernel/stacktrace.c. See arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c for reference, but I
> think it would be much much simpler here given the changelog description.
Is there an exhaustive, definite, non-x86-centric description of the cases
this function needs to look for? Maybe some sort of formal specification?
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists