linux-kernel - Re: [v7, 3/3] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi/imx6ul.dtsi: add "fsl, imx6q-snvs-lpgpr" node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:07:54 +0100
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Guy Shapiro <guy.shapiro@...i-wize.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v7, 3/3] ARM: dts: imx6qdl.dtsi/imx6ul.dtsi: add "fsl,
 imx6q-snvs-lpgpr" node

Hi Maciej,


Am 11.12.2017 um 23:31 schrieb Maciej S. Szmigiero:
> On 20.06.2017 09:09, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> This node is for Low Power General Purpose Register which can
>> be used as Non-Volatile Storage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 4 ++++
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi  | 4 ++++
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>> index e426faa9c243..94e992558238 100644
> (..)
>
> FYI: It looks to me that while the driver itself from this series was
> picked up and eventually reached Linus' tree this DT change was
> forgotten, since I can't find in any tree (or am I not looking at the
> right place?).

thanks for the reminder. It's possible that this patch won't apply 
anymore and needs a resend.

>
> Maciej
>