linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:07:35 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Linus,
> 
> >
> >  - two 5-level paging related fixes
> 
> Which reminds me: can you grab this one, too?
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/24c898b4f44fdf8c22d93703850fb384ef87cfdc.1513035461.git.luto@kernel.org

Yeah, done - it's now in x86/urgent as:

  c739f930be1d: x86/espfix/64: Fix espfix double-fault handling on 5-level systems

Will push it out soon. Linus will get it with the next x86/urgent batch, as 
there's no production 5-level paging CPUs out there yet, right?

I'm also picking up your pending PTI fixes/updates over the weekend, but I spent 
today mostly to make sure that the system call trampoline bits and its 
dependencies were robust in practice.

Could you please have a good look at that tree:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git tmp.tmp

This includes the preparatory merges and cherry-picks, and some other low risk 
preparatory bits related to PTI.

Is this tree looking good to you standalone?

Note that the lack of runtime patching on non-Intel systems by default is 
intentionally not included at this stage, so that it's all simpler, and that we 
get more test coverage...

This tree is what I've been testing all day, including suspend/resume testing, and 
which I wanted to send to Linus later today as an RFC pull request, assuming 
there's no last minute showstoppers. (Right after I've seen the new Star Wars 
movie with my son - because priorities! ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo