lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:47:06 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> Subject: [question] should 363b02dab09b3 be backported to stable 4.1+? Hello David, Eric, please help me out. I'm looking at 363b02dab09b ("KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding a negative key") right now. So, I see that it has been backported to stable 4.4+. My question is -- do we have those test_bit(KEY_FLAG_INSTANTIATED) and test_bit(KEY_FLAG_NEGATIVE) races in stable 4.1? -ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists