lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:47:06 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [question] should 363b02dab09b3 be backported to stable 4.1+?

Hello David, Eric,

please help me out.

I'm looking at 363b02dab09b ("KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding
a negative key") right now. So, I see that it has been backported to stable
4.4+. My question is -- do we have those test_bit(KEY_FLAG_INSTANTIATED)
and test_bit(KEY_FLAG_NEGATIVE) races in stable 4.1?

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists