linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 1/2] vxlan: speedup vxlan tunnels dismantle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 17:54:49 +0800
From:   Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] vxlan: speedup vxlan tunnels dismantle

Since we now hold RTNL lock in vxlan_exit_net, it's better to batch them
to speedup vxlan tunnels dismantle.

Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 19b9cc5..48a0dc2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -3692,18 +3692,16 @@ static __net_init int vxlan_init_net(struct net *net)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void __net_exit vxlan_exit_net(struct net *net)
+static void vxlan_destroy_tunnels(struct net *net, struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(net, vxlan_net_id);
 	struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, *next;
 	struct net_device *dev, *aux;
 	unsigned int h;
-	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
-	rtnl_lock();
 	for_each_netdev_safe(net, dev, aux)
 		if (dev->rtnl_link_ops == &vxlan_link_ops)
-			unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, &list);
+			unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vxlan, next, &vn->vxlan_list, next) {
 		/* If vxlan->dev is in the same netns, it has already been added
@@ -3711,20 +3709,30 @@ static void __net_exit vxlan_exit_net(struct net *net)
 		 */
 		if (!net_eq(dev_net(vxlan->dev), net)) {
 			gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
-			unregister_netdevice_queue(vxlan->dev, &list);
+			unregister_netdevice_queue(vxlan->dev, head);
 		}
 	}
 
-	unregister_netdevice_many(&list);
-	rtnl_unlock();
-
 	for (h = 0; h < PORT_HASH_SIZE; ++h)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlist_empty(&vn->sock_list[h]));
 }
 
+static void __net_exit vxlan_exit_batch_net(struct list_head *net_list)
+{
+	struct net *net;
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list)
+		vxlan_destroy_tunnels(net, &list);
+
+	unregister_netdevice_many(&list);
+	rtnl_unlock();
+}
+
 static struct pernet_operations vxlan_net_ops = {
 	.init = vxlan_init_net,
-	.exit = vxlan_exit_net,
+	.exit_batch = vxlan_exit_batch_net,
 	.id   = &vxlan_net_id,
 	.size = sizeof(struct vxlan_net),
 };
-- 
1.8.3.1