| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:46:05 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at, hughd@...gle.com, keescook@...gle.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 080/159] x86/dumpstack: Add get_stack_info() support for the SYSENTER stack
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
commit 33a2f1a6c4d7c0a02d1c006fb0379cc5ca3b96bb upstream.
get_stack_info() doesn't currently know about the SYSENTER stack, so
unwinding will fail if we entered the kernel on the SYSENTER stack
and haven't fully switched off. Teach get_stack_info() about the
SYSENTER stack.
With future patches applied that run part of the entry code on the
SYSENTER stack and introduce an intentional BUG(), I would get:
PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0
...
RIP: 0010:do_error_trap+0x33/0x1c0
...
Call Trace:
Code: ...
With this patch, I get:
PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0
...
Call Trace:
<SYSENTER>
? async_page_fault+0x36/0x60
? invalid_op+0x22/0x40
? async_page_fault+0x36/0x60
? sync_regs+0x3c/0x40
? sync_regs+0x2e/0x40
? error_entry+0x6c/0xd0
? async_page_fault+0x36/0x60
</SYSENTER>
Code: ...
which is a lot more informative.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: aliguori@...zon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@...gle.com
Cc: keescook@...gle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204150605.392711508@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 8da111b3c342..f8062bfd43a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ enum stack_type {
STACK_TYPE_TASK,
STACK_TYPE_IRQ,
STACK_TYPE_SOFTIRQ,
+ STACK_TYPE_SYSENTER,
STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION,
STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION_LAST = STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION + N_EXCEPTION_STACKS-1,
};
@@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ struct stack_info {
bool in_task_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
struct stack_info *info);
+bool in_sysenter_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info);
+
int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 0bc95be5c638..a33a1373a252 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -43,6 +43,25 @@ bool in_task_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
return true;
}
+bool in_sysenter_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
+{
+ struct tss_struct *tss = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_tss);
+
+ /* Treat the canary as part of the stack for unwinding purposes. */
+ void *begin = &tss->SYSENTER_stack_canary;
+ void *end = (void *)&tss->SYSENTER_stack + sizeof(tss->SYSENTER_stack);
+
+ if ((void *)stack < begin || (void *)stack >= end)
+ return false;
+
+ info->type = STACK_TYPE_SYSENTER;
+ info->begin = begin;
+ info->end = end;
+ info->next_sp = NULL;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable,
char *log_lvl)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index daefae83a3aa..5ff13a6b3680 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ const char *stack_type_name(enum stack_type type)
if (type == STACK_TYPE_SOFTIRQ)
return "SOFTIRQ";
+ if (type == STACK_TYPE_SYSENTER)
+ return "SYSENTER";
+
return NULL;
}
@@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
if (task != current)
goto unknown;
+ if (in_sysenter_stack(stack, info))
+ goto recursion_check;
+
if (in_hardirq_stack(stack, info))
goto recursion_check;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 88ce2ffdb110..abc828f8c297 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ const char *stack_type_name(enum stack_type type)
if (type == STACK_TYPE_IRQ)
return "IRQ";
+ if (type == STACK_TYPE_SYSENTER)
+ return "SYSENTER";
+
if (type >= STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION && type <= STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION_LAST)
return exception_stack_names[type - STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION];
@@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task,
if (in_irq_stack(stack, info))
goto recursion_check;
+ if (in_sysenter_stack(stack, info))
+ goto recursion_check;
+
goto unknown;
recursion_check:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists