lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:33:35 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Cc:     peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: TPM driver breaks S3 suspend

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 04:04:56PM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> Hi,
>     We have a desktop which has S3 suspend (to RAM) problem due to
> error messages as follows.
> [  198.908282] tpm tpm0: Error (38) sending savestate before suspend
> [  198.908289] __pnp_bus_suspend(): tpm_pm_suspend+0x0/0x160 returns 38
> [  198.908293] dpm_run_callback(): pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x20 returns 38
> [  198.908298] PM: Device 00:0b failed to suspend: error 38
> 
>     However, the first suspend after boot is working although it still
> shows an interesting message during resume.
> [  155.789945] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (38) occurred continue selftest
> 
>     The error code 38 in definition is TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT. I
> found some explanations which said this error code means that this
> command was received in the wrong sequence relative to a TPM_Startup
> command. Don't really know what happens here and how should I deal
> with this? Any suggestions? Please let me know what else information
> should I provide. Thanks
> 
> Chris

The sequences for initializing TPM 1.x devices has been fairly static
for a long time. Has this occured after a kernel update? Is there a
kernel version where it used to work and a version where it doesn't?
Thanks.

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ