linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v12 4/5] PCI / PM: Add support for the PCIe WAKE# signal for OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Dec 2017 10:47:24 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 4/5] PCI / PM: Add support for the PCIe WAKE#
 signal for OF

On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 09:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:32 PM, JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> wrote:

> this new file does something similar to the pci-acpi.c and pci-mid.c..

> pci-acpi.c has similar things to pci/of.c. The naming is just not
> consistent.

> > and i am agree the naming is not clear, maybe we can rename both of
> > those
> > files to something like pci-pm-***.c?
> 
> At least pci-acpi.c is more than just PM functions, so that doesn't
> make sense. Given that all the ACPI related functions are in 1 file,
> we should do the same for DT.

> > but i have no idea about pci-mid.c or would it possible to have more
> > platform pm ops in the future...maybe we should add some dependency
> > in the
> > Kconfig?

You may consider pci-mid.c as pci-sfi.c to some extend.

So, in that sense it more looks like pci-of.c would be the name for DT
case.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy