linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:09:45 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, der.herr@...r.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning


* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:42:45PM -0500, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > >> Assuming that the authorship of this one-line change does not matter, as it
> > >> is largely suggested by the clang compiler anyway, and we want to move the
> > >> change forward, we should decide on which of three patches to move
> > >> forward. I can give my Reviewed-by and Tested-by to any of them.
> > 
> > I suppose Ingo would take the first and accumulate Reviewed-By tags.
> > I don't particularly care about authorship (please just fix the bug).
> > 
> > > The patch from Lukas was the first one I received, so that's the one I
> > > used.  I rewrote the commit msg for clarity and added my SOB and sent it
> > > to Ingo for merging.
> > 
> > I think you should have kept Nicholas Mc Guire's Reviewed by tag?
> > Maybe Ingo can re-add his and mine when merging?
> 
> Yes, sorry, I missed that one.
> 
> Ingo, can you please add the following?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>

Sure, done!

Thanks,

	Ingo