linux-kernel - Re: ftrace/module: Move ftrace_release_mod to ddebug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Dec 2017 02:02:43 +0100
From:   Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Namit Gupta <gupta.namit@...sung.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com,
        a.sahrawat@...sung.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: ftrace/module: Move ftrace_release_mod to ddebug_cleanup label

+++ Steven Rostedt [28/12/17 19:57 -0500]:
>On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:36:48 +0100
>Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> +++ Steven Rostedt [28/12/17 11:32 -0500]:
>> >
>> >Jessica,
>> >
>> >Can you take this patch. You can add:
>> >
>> >Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>
>> Sure, thanks Steven.
>>
>> Namit, your patch does not apply cleanly to modules-next nor
>> linux-next. It looks like you based your patch on an old tree?
>> (e.g., we got rid of the module_core and core_size fields a few years
>> ago...) Could you please rebase your patch on linux-next and resend?
>
>I should probably re-review the rebased patch.

Yeah, that'd be much appreciated :-)

Thanks!

Jessica