linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: sun9i: Support SMP on A80 with Multi-Cluster Power Management (MCPM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:47:19 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Mylène Josserand 
        <mylene.josserand@...e-electrons.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, clabbe.montjoie@...il.com,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: sun9i: Support SMP on A80 with Multi-Cluster
 Power Management (MCPM)

Mylène, Chen-Yu,

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Mylène Josserand
<mylene.josserand@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> The A80 is a big.LITTLE SoC with 1 cluster of 4 Cortex-A7s and
> 1 cluster of 4 Cortex-A15s.

<snip>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mcpm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Chen-Yu Tsai
> + *
> + * Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> + *
> + * arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mcpm.c
> + *
> + * Based on arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c and Allwinner code
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */

Would you mind using a concise SPDX tag instead, as documented by
Thomas doc patches?

Thank you for your kind consideration!
-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne