linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 31 Dec 2017 13:32:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> > Commit
>> >
>> >   0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device")
>> >
>> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its .
>>                                       ^
>> committer
>
> It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next
> tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it
> looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the
> commit shows him in the committer field.

In PDx86 subsystem we in the result of this check split our (Darren's
and mine) review queues to a separate *non-published* (OK, they are
visible, but not considered published) branches.
Rebase, as stated that time by Linus, as formally creating new commits.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko