linux-kernel - Re: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:49:43 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function
 implementations

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:10 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > Leave those pr_ messages alone, please,
[]
> Andy and Henrique raised a few reasons why these patches should not be
> accepted:
> 
> 1. This is init code (so any space savings is short lived)

Not exactly true.

The object code itself is short lived, but the
string constant of the format is not as it is
placed in const and not discarded.