linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: add 696MHz operating point for i.mx6ul

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:34:00 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
        "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: add 696MHz operating point for i.mx6ul

On Saturday, January 6, 2018 4:05:41 AM CET Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Rafael
> 
> Best Regards!
> Anson Huang
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rjwysocki@...il.com [mailto:rjwysocki@...il.com] On Behalf Of Rafael
> > J. Wysocki
> > Sent: 2018-01-05 8:21 PM
> > To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Linux
> > PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Sascha Hauer
> > <kernel@...gutronix.de>; Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>; Rob
> > Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>;
> > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> > <rjw@...ysocki.net>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>; Jacky Bai
> > <ping.bai@....com>; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: add 696MHz operating point for
> > i.mx6ul
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com> wrote:
> > > Add 696MHz operating point for i.MX6UL, only for those parts with
> > > speed grading fuse set to 2b'10 supports 696MHz operating point, so,
> > > speed grading check is also added for i.MX6UL in this patch, the clock
> > > tree for each operating point are as below:
> > >
> > > 696MHz:
> > >     pll1                       696000000
> > >        pll1_bypass             696000000
> > >           pll1_sys             696000000
> > >              pll1_sw           696000000
> > >                 arm            696000000
> > > 528MHz:
> > >     pll2                       528000000
> > >        pll2_bypass             528000000
> > >           pll2_bus             528000000
> > >              ca7_secondary_sel 528000000
> > >                 step           528000000
> > >                    pll1_sw     528000000
> > >                       arm      528000000
> > > 396MHz:
> > >     pll2_pfd2_396m             396000000
> > >        ca7_secondary_sel       396000000
> > >           step                 396000000
> > >              pll1_sw           396000000
> > >                 arm            396000000
> > > 198MHz:
> > >     pll2_pfd2_396m             396000000
> > >        ca7_secondary_sel       396000000
> > >           step                 396000000
> > >              pll1_sw           396000000
> > >                 arm            198000000
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > 
> > This doesn't apply for me and in a nontrivial way.
> > 
> > What kernel is it against?
> 
> I did it based on linux-next, it should be on linux-next-pm branch, I redo
> the patch set V2 based on linux-next-pm, also redo the test,
> sorry for the inconvenience.

But you didn't add the Reviewed-by: tags from Fabio to them.

Was that on purpose or by mistake?

Thanks,
Rafael