lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:28:55 +0800
From:   Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
To:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc:     shawnguo@...nel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: gpc: de-register power domains only if
 initialized

On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> If power domain information are missing in the device tree, no
> power domains get initialized. However, imx_gpc_remove tries to
> remove power domains always in the old DT binding case. Only
> remove power domains when imx_gpc_probe initialized them in
> first place.
> 
> Fixes: 721cabf6c660 ("soc: imx: move PGC handling to a new GPC driver")
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> index 53f7275d6cbd..62bb724726d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> @@ -470,13 +470,21 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static int imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {

What's the original purpose of imx_gpc_remove?
ARM power domain can't be removed.

And why current imx_gpc_remove only remove domains for old DT but not
for new ones?

How about make it un-removable?
e.g.

diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
index 47e7aa9..7fc6737 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
@@ -454,36 +454,17 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-       int ret;
-
-       /*
-        * If the old DT binding is used the toplevel driver needs to
-        * de-register the power domains
-        */
-       if (!of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc")) {
-               of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
-
-               ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU].base);
-               if (ret)
-                       return ret;
-               imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU]);
-
-               ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_ARM].base);
-               if (ret)
-                       return ret;
-       }
-
-       return 0;
-}
-
 static struct platform_driver imx_gpc_driver = {
        .driver = {
                .name = "imx-gpc",
                .of_match_table = imx_gpc_dt_ids,
+                /*
+                 * We can't forcibly eject devices form power domain,
+                 * so we can't really remove power domains once they
+                 * were added.
+                 */
+                .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
        },
        .probe = imx_gpc_probe,
-       .remove = imx_gpc_remove,
 };
 builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> +	struct device_node *pgc_node;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	pgc_node = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc");
> +
> +	/* bail out if DT too old and doesn't provide the necessary info */
> +	if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells") &&
> +	    !pgc_node)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If the old DT binding is used the toplevel driver needs to
>  	 * de-register the power domains
>  	 */
> -	if (!of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "pgc")) {
> +	if (!pgc_node) {
>  		of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
>  
>  		ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU].base);
> -- 
> 2.15.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ