linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] bindings: regulator: added support for suspend states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:35:33 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] bindings: regulator: added support for suspend
 states

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> On 6 January 2018 at 03:18, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > No, it means that the software has permission to use those changes to
> > those registers - we only want to be changing things if the user has
> > permission to change them since some systems will have specific
> > constraints, we don't know if it's safe without being explicitly told.
> > You're right that we could infer this from a range being provided
> > though, let's do that.

> Ok, so we don't need this property IIUC, and instead we just need to check
> if the regulator-suspend-min-microvolt and regulator-suspend-max-microvolt
> are set to the same value, right?

Yes.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)