lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  8 Jan 2018 19:19:52 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] mux: core: fix double get_device()

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
 drivers/mux/core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi Greg,

Perhaps this was ignored due to more important stuff?

Original message below:

Here is a fix for 4.15, and it should perhaps also go to
stable?

It's been in -next for a couple of weeks w/o complaints.

Cheers,
Peter

diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
index 2260063b0ea8..6e5cf9d9cd99 100644
--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
 	return dev->of_node == data;
 }
 
+/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
 static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
 	    (!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
 			np, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
 	if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
 			np, controller, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 	return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);
-- 
2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ