linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powercap: add suspend and resume mechanism for SOC power limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 09 Jan 2018 11:00:44 -0800
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, xinx.sun@...el.com,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     zhen.han@...el.com, chaox.m.wang@...el.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: add suspend and resume mechanism for SOC
 power limit

On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 12:39 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 9:25:10 AM CET xinx.sun@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Zhen Han <zhen.han@...el.com>
> > 
> > PL1 and PL2 could be throlled or de-throttled by
> > Thermal management to control SOC temperature.
> > However, currently, their value will be reset to default value
> > after once system suspend and resume.
> > Add pm_notifier to save PL1, PL2 before system suspect and restore
> > PL1, PL2 after system resume.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sun Xinx <xinx.sun@...el.com>
> 
> Jacob, Srinivas, please have a look at this.
I have already looked at this. Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 97
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > index d1694f1..0188cff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >  #include <linux/powercap.h>
> > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> >  #include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> > @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ struct rapl_power_limit {
> >  	int prim_id; /* primitive ID used to enable */
> >  	struct rapl_domain *domain;
> >  	const char *name;
> > +	u64 last_power_limit;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const char pl1_name[] = "long_term";
> > @@ -1533,6 +1535,92 @@ static int rapl_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int
> > cpu)
> >  
> >  static enum cpuhp_state pcap_rapl_online;
> >  
> > +static void power_limit_state_save(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct rapl_package *rp;
> > +	struct rapl_domain *rd;
> > +	int nr_pl, ret, i;
> > +
> > +	get_online_cpus();
> > +	list_for_each_entry(rp, &rapl_packages, plist) {
> > +		if (!rp->power_zone)
> > +			continue;
> > +		rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(rp->power_zone);
> > +		nr_pl = find_nr_power_limit(rd);
> > +		for (i = 0; i < nr_pl; i++) {
> > +			switch (rd->rpl[i].prim_id) {
> > +			case PL1_ENABLE:
> > +				ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd,
> > +						POWER_LIMIT1,
> > +						true,
> > +						&rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit);
> > +				if (ret)
> > +					rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit = 0;
> > +				break;
> > +			case PL2_ENABLE:
> > +				ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd,
> > +						POWER_LIMIT2,
> > +						true,
> > +						&rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit);
> > +				if (ret)
> > +					rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit = 0;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	put_online_cpus();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void power_limit_state_restore(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct rapl_package *rp;
> > +	struct rapl_domain *rd;
> > +	int nr_pl, i;
> > +
> > +	get_online_cpus();
> > +	list_for_each_entry(rp, &rapl_packages, plist) {
> > +		if (!rp->power_zone)
> > +			continue;
> > +		rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(rp->power_zone);
> > +		nr_pl = find_nr_power_limit(rd);
> > +		for (i = 0; i < nr_pl; i++) {
> > +			switch (rd->rpl[i].prim_id) {
> > +			case PL1_ENABLE:
> > +				if (rd->rpl[i].last_power_limit)
> > +					rapl_write_data_raw(rd,
> > +						POWER_LIMIT1,
> > +						rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit);
> > +				break;
> > +			case PL2_ENABLE:
> > +				if (rd->rpl[i].last_power_limit)
> > +					rapl_write_data_raw(rd,
> > +						POWER_LIMIT2,
> > +						rd-
> > >rpl[i].last_power_limit);
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	put_online_cpus();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rapl_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > +	unsigned long mode, void *_unused)
> > +{
> > +	switch (mode) {
> > +	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> > +		power_limit_state_save();
> > +		break;
> > +	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> > +		power_limit_state_restore();
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block rapl_pm_notifier = {
> > +	.notifier_call = rapl_pm_callback,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int __init rapl_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
> > @@ -1560,8 +1648,16 @@ static int __init rapl_init(void)
> >  
> >  	/* Don't bail out if PSys is not supported */
> >  	rapl_register_psys();
> > +
> > +	ret = register_pm_notifier(&rapl_pm_notifier);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_unreg_all;
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > +err_unreg_all:
> > +	cpuhp_remove_state(pcap_rapl_online);
> > +
> >  err_unreg:
> >  	rapl_unregister_powercap();
> >  	return ret;
> > @@ -1569,6 +1665,7 @@ static int __init rapl_init(void)
> >  
> >  static void __exit rapl_exit(void)
> >  {
> > +	unregister_pm_notifier(&rapl_pm_notifier);
> >  	cpuhp_remove_state(pcap_rapl_online);
> >  	rapl_unregister_powercap();
> >  }
> > 
> 
>