linux-kernel - Re: perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:05:51 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:56:52AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > So CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y and booting with "pti=off" makes it
> > 'work', right?
> 
> yes.  Previously I was changing CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION and 
> recompiling, but just now I booted with it set to yes and pti=off and the 
> fuzzer has been running fine for a half hour (usually it crashes in under 
> 5 minutes).
> 
> I did see these in the logs which I don't think I've seen before.
> 
> WARNING: stack recursion on stack type 2
> WARNING: can't dereference iret registers at 000000000783fea8 for ip paranoid_entry+0x2e/0x90
> WARNING: can't dereference registers at 00000000f0698d17 for ip paranoid_entry+0x4c/0x90
> WARNING: stack going in the wrong direction? ip=native_sched_clock+0x9/0x90

I've seen that last one, but not the ones before. Josh, this isn't
healty, right?  :-)

> > The below is always my first try to get something out of the machine,
> > after that its printk() stuffing code to see how far we get..
> > 
> > In particular I'd start instrumenting the NMI entry_64.S code, because
> > that's really the biggest difference between PTI and !PTI :/ all rather
> > bothersome I'm afraid.
> 
> I'll try that next.  Also getting a few other machines up and into a 
> state that I can start fuzzing on them. 
> 
> (extra challenge, the lab my machines is in possibly has a leak in the 
> roof, and they're calling for an inch of rain on top of 3 feet of 
> existing snow so I might have to shut everything down and relocate on 
> short notice).

Ouch, good luck with that!