lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 01:39:19 +0000
From:   "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
To:     "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [patch RFC 1/5] x86/CPU: Sync CPU feature flags late

 
> In other words, if you use late microcode loading for getting IBRS, you
> don't get ALTERNATIVE patching and its benefits?
> 
> I'll also profess some microcode ignorance here.  Is "late microcode
> patching" *all* of the stuff we do from the OS, or do we have early and
> late Linux loading in addition to what the BIOS can do?

the early boot loader level stuff is much better generally (but does not work when the microcode comes out after the system booted... like really long uptimes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ